TIGblogs TIG | TIGblogs GROUP TIGBLOGS LOGIN SIGNUP
live the questions now
live the questions now
« previous 5


TIG at the National Service Learning Conference
About this event: National Service Learning Conference

Translations available in: English (original) | French | Spanish | Italian | German | Portuguese | Swedish | Russian | Dutch | Arabic

The deluges of rain, snow, and American Airlines cancellations from April 9-12 were no deterrents to a great few days at the National Service Learning Conference in Minneapolis. I still haven’t broken my recent streak of traveling to bad weather (San Antonio, I have my eye on you…) but the NSLC was worth it nonetheless.

A couple months ago, a fellow frequent-conference-exhibitor had tried to warn me about the NSLC, a conference, in their opinion, with a totally dead exhibit hall. In MY opinion, an empty exhibit hall is a sign of a GOOD conference! Not only was I glad to see that the NSLC has such a compelling agenda that people actually went to the workshops, but the booth saw plenty of traffic during breakfast, lunch, and other breaks.

I met a professor from Argentina who coordinates a network of thousands of schools there involved in service learning (Damian, I’ll be putting you two in touch!), made new contacts at organizations looking for online tools to connect the young people in their programs, and shared resources with several hundred teachers and students who are highly active in service learning projects in their schools and communities.

And, when things were a little slow, I took the opportunity to check out all the other great groups who were there to share resources with the young people and educators involved in service learning. I’m still not all the way through the stack of materials I picked up, but here’s a sample:

At the Free Tibet booth, I signed a petition and had an inspiring conversation with a student activist (who is a Tibetan refugee born in India, now living and studying in Saint Paul – he told me Minnesota has the second largest Tibetan community in the US) about Tibet, China, and the Olympics.

At the Peace Corps booth, I learned more about how they connect volunteers in the field to classrooms in the US, and met a staffer who thinks very highly of the TIG Guide to Action, and recommended that their whole network use it in planning events for Global Youth Service Day. It means a lot to have the endorsement of a leading service organization.

The folks from the Shinnyo-En Foundation were handing out t-shirts and DVDs to promote their new Six Billion Paths to Peace initiative, and I talked to a program officer for a while to understand what the campaign is about, since I missed out on the gala that the rest of the GYAN crew attended in New York in March (while I was still recovering from the flu) :)

There was no one at the Project Learning Tree booth, but I was intrigued by this sign, in thinking about our own sustainability practices when it comes to outreach and marketing:

no exhibit hall carpeting

It was also great to meet leaders from Youth Service America and put faces to names I’ve heard around the GYAN office in planning for GYSD.

There were three sessions I managed to attend – both keynotes (awesome move on NSLC’s part to close the exhibit hall during the keynotes!), as well as a panel on youth media.

Pedro Noguera, as much respect as I have for his work, gave a surprisingly generic keynote compared to other times I’ve heard him speak. He made some great points about how unacceptable and sorry the state of our education system is, but with this crowd, he might have been preaching to the choir. Then again, almost every keynote I’ve ever heard pales in comparison to the inspiration and energy and awe that I gained from hearing Archbishop Desmond Tutu deliver the keynote on Friday. How can you beat a Nobel Peace Prize Winner and spiritual leader telling a knock-knock joke in reference to the Bible?

Archbishop Tutu tells a knock knock joke

In all seriousness though, having spent a lot of time thinking about the distinctions between service and activism, Desmond Tutu’s keynote gave a refreshing bit of historical perspective. I’ve struggled with the way service and activism (both of which fall under the umbrella of civic engagement) are often separated from one another, particularly service as a “safe” or non-political term, one used to describe what students do unto other, less-fortunate people, while activism gets pigeon-holed as a more radical thing that happens separately from learning. In limiting what each term means, we also misunderstand and underestimate the importance they play in enabling young people as social changemakers, whether in school or out. Archbishop Tutu reminded us that young people have always been changemakers and activists – from the Bible (it was a young person, David, who stood up to Goliath) to the students who led the civil rights movement, protested against South African apartheid, and now speak out against the Chinese occupation of Tibet.

Finally, the youth media panel was perhaps a bit long, but I learned about some cool projects:

- thefoshow.com – Run out of the high school for performing arts in Minneapolis, it’s the only commercial radio station in US completely run and produced by high school students.

- Strive Media – print and video production (Gumbo Teen Magazine) out of Minneapolis

- Beyond Green – the latest project from Listen Up!

- Teen International Media Exchange (TIME) – program using media to explore seven global issues, based at Media Academy at Cleveland HS in Los Angeles

I was really honored to meet Sidibay, a young person I’ve heard a lot about through our mutual friends at iEARN Canada, who presented his award-winning documentary about his life as a child soldier in Sierra Leone.

The importance of global perspectives and connections in service learning really seems to be on the rise within the NSLC community, so it was great to participate in that conversation as it expands, and hope we’ll be back next year!

April 21, 2008 | 1:09 PM Comments  1 comments



humans like to solve problems
About this event: Technology + Learning Conference


My rough notes from Professor James Paul Gee's keynote. I'll come back and synthesize later :)


the old literacy gap -- too many kids don't read as well as they could

the applications gap -- even children who do well in school and can pass tests can't apply their knowledge in the real world

the new tech-savvy gap -- new technology in schools doesn't automatically minimize the gap.

the new knowledge gap -- knowing how to use the new technology. what you do with technology matters.

the innovation crisis -- kids need to learn innovation and creativity.

all of these gaps need to be addressed holistically. and games are one way to do this and to better situate learning and literacy.

empathy for a complex system. simulations are what scientists use to learn and conduct research, but games are even better because players are inside their simulations and have an immersive perspective on that world (which scientists generally don't have when they conduct simulations). However, studies show that scientists think as though they are.

**typical of my inability to focus, I stopped paying attention because I got wrapped up reading comments on a gamer site about how to succeed at playing Ayiti

back to Gee's talk.

games put performance before competence, meaning that you're allowed to try something even if you haven't developed full knowledge of it (unlike traditional schooling)

World of Warcraft -- example of a "cross-functional team" where every team member has deep expertise in one area, but also need to understand other team member's functions to integrate all the skills. "understand your expertise from other people's perspective"

School doesn't develop these soft skills very well, but work expects them.

generational assumption -- if i can't understand the book, i can't use the tool. older people always want to read the manual first, even though often now the manual won't make sense if you haven't used the tool/played the game yet.

kids often don't do well in school because they have no context for the complex academic language -- the language in school is not situated in the world in which kids live. and the kids aren't given the opportunity to experience the subject matter in a way that gives meaning to the words used to describe it. (If you DO geology, you will get the language of geology).

assessment in games works because it starts with the concrete and is then abstracted. "tracking what you've done AFTER you've done it"

games are motivating BECAUSE they involve learning. Learning and mastery of something is deeply rewarding for us as people. They also foster failure that produces learning, which is not how failure in school is structured!

research shows that kids love competition in games but hate competition in school. Possibly because in games, competition is a source of collaboration.

the interactivity and inquiry that games allow are another reason that they are engaging -- people like problem solving spaces :)

games as opportunities for customization and production -- you can make the game as much as you play it. And making the game allows kids to learn about the underlying structure (more inquiry)

games allow identity construction -- "new learning creates new identity" -- so games are a way for learning to be applied through identity, and to use identity as a way of making choices and understanding our perspectives.

Good games allow us to make big choices. So does good curriculum.

Games are pleasantly frustrating, like many of the other good things in life.

Cycle of expertise -- practice until absolute mastery. Then apply in a situation where it doesn't solve the problem. Now practice that until you're sick of it. And over and over.
(This could be the basis, in the future, of kids being part of curriculum development.)

**This reminds me of playing the violin and cello as a little kid. My mom used to always say that practice doesn't make perfect, practice makes practice. Only perfect practice makes perfect. I can hear her saying "I told you so" all the way from Virginia.


November 10, 2006 | 12:33 PM Comments  0 comments

Tags:


We need to protect students from themselves
About this event: Technology + Learning Conference


I attended a panel today that claimed to be about social networking and education, but as tends to be all the educational conference rage, it was mostly about the dark side of what kids can do on MySpace and the adult-centric response (including what the adults at MySpace are doing to keep all the other adults happy).

It's depressing to hear educators talk about students only in terms of their deficits. This conversation focused on filtering, blocking, policies, discipline; the only mention of curriculum integration was "teaching internet safety" -- which sounded, to me, like one way transmission of information from adult "experts" on what they consider "appropriate use" to students whose ideas are invalid. Why are we ignoring the evidence about social context and learning? And refusing to consider whether students are capable of positive online behavior or interested in collaborative learning?

The two saddest things I heard were the student representative on the panel suggesting that punishment is the most effective way to teach students online safety (if you take it away from us, we'll learn our lesson)!! And that Myspace allows parents to request that Myspace delete their kids' accounts, without even having the kid involved in the decision.

I had a moment of optimism when one panelist started saying, "there are good, intelligent, effective..." and I thought he was going to say "online communities for youth" but no. That sentence finished with "ways to block sites."

The panel identified the following challenges/threats posed by social networking sites:
-online predators are going to get into students' heads and manipulate them
-we need to protect students from themselves
-internet threats are different from real world threats because you have a false sense of security
-kids just don't understand what is safe

Not only was there no significant evidence offered to support any of these claims, but no one seemed to consider how incongruent these generalizations are with 21st Century Skills. Statements like these assume that kids aren't capable of media literacy, critical thinking, cross-cultural understanding, social responsibility, etc. And worse, it sends the message that there is no knowledge to be constructed or meaning to be made from the way young people use technology. So just shut it off. Game over.

When asked about the potential benefits, one person said:
"I haven't seen it, but some people are saying that there could be benefits of students blogging"

You think?

The silver lining to this forum was that, finally, the panelist from Chicago Public Schools pointed out that there ARE opportunities to leverage social networking tools and digital media for improving learning, but we as educators have to make those connections. I happily approached her afterwards to ask if she had heard of TIG (yes, thanks to a past presentation at NECC) and after talking for a while I had met two innovative educators with great ideas that I hope they will bring to TIGed's community.

But don't tell anyone I was social networking.

November 9, 2006 | 3:16 PM Comments  0 comments

Tags:


« previous 5


Emily Kornblut's Profile

Emily Kornblut's Friends


Latest Posts
I'm sorry to...
YMEX public beta goes...
TIG at the National...
Internationalization/L...
Textbooks of the Future

Monthly Archive
September 2006
November 2006
February 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
October 2007
November 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008

My Group Blogs
TIGed

Change Language


Tags Archive
21stcenturylearning career chateau education failure france friends globalkids international iron ironman laptop learning localization man mask media minneapolis multilingual photo profession rolemodels science service sxsw technology textbooks tig tiged translation

Filter By Type
Events
News
Travel
Topics

Friends
Akili Lee
Mahcaiyah
Lisa
aarmstrong
Alana
Alexis Menten
Amita
Andi
bjoseph
Bob Harmon
Caitlin Leigh Chandler
Calin Rus
Campbell McLean
Carleen Huxley
Casey
Cassie
Chiara C.
cmestoque
cmsShaelynn
curtis chandler
Damian Profeta
dan winckler
David Gibson
David Glick
Davina
Donna H
Elizabeth Sanchez
Emily Briggs
Francis
Franziska Seel
fred myers
Gregory M
GSimon
Heather Girling
Hugh Switzer
J.D.Klein
Jane
Jennifer Corriero
Joanne
Jon Sato
Julia Poole
karen
kate raynes-goldie
Kirsten
LauraK
Lawson Shaw
LisaY
liz hitchcock
Lucy Gray
Luke Walker
Mali Bickley
Matt
meganma
Michael Furdyk
Mrs. Meagher
Ms. Strahler
Ms.Margarit
Mwansa Njelesani
Natalie Rodic
Natasha
Neider
Nick Yeo
Ozzy
P.J. Partington
Reshma Pattni
rmatchock
Robert McDonald
Robin White
sarah
SOF-BreannaB
SOF-DejaS
SOF-DemitryB
SOF-ImanG
SOF-NataniaH
SOF-SoleilW
SOF-ZahkiaT
Stephanie Penev
technologygeek
Ted Bongiovanni
Todd Fraser
Vicki A Davis
Victoria Restler
Vidar Ekehaug
whday-connorc
Ya-Nan (Kim) Lee
Yasmary Mora

Links
The Official TIGed Blog!
TIGed


40527 views
Important Disclaimer